Philip Favro

April 27, 2021
Dispute Over Linked Google Drive Documents Highlights Discovery Challenges

Dispute Over Linked Google Drive Documents Highlights Discovery Challenges with Information Systems

The rising growth of cloud-based storage and communication tools has led users to increasingly share messages with hyperlinks to documents stored in online repositories. The corresponding impact of this trend is that these communications, together with the linked documents, are increasingly sought as evidence in litigation. However, there are complexities with collecting and producing linked documents that may lead to motion practice and delays if parties do not establish a process for handling this information at the outset of discovery.
March 29, 2021
Special Masters - A Cost Effective Method for Handling eDiscovery

Special Masters: A Cost Effective Method for Handling eDiscovery

Litigants and courts are always on the lookout for ways to expedite the disposition of litigation. One of the most cost-effective methods for doing so is engaging a special master to help manage discovery.
February 8, 2021
Court Rejects Slack Production

Court Rejects Slack Production, Spotlights Discovery Pitfalls for Requesting Parties

Discovery issues associated with Slack data have typically focused on responding parties. However, a recent court order rejecting production of Slack communications should be cause for concern among requesting parties. In Laub v. Horbaczewski, the court held that relevant Slack messages were not reasonably accessible and beyond the responding party’s possession, custody, or control. The holding from Laub—which lacks supporting analysis, pertinent legal authority, and a fulsome understanding of the Slack “Standard Export” process—could be problematic on multiple levels for requesting parties if followed by other courts on Slack discovery issues.
February 2, 2021
New ESI Sanctions Order Offers eDiscovery 101 course

New ESI Sanctions Order Offers eDiscovery 101 Course for Lawyers

Courts have decried for years a general lack of understanding and awareness regarding electronic discovery among lawyers. On January 19, 2021, U.S. District Judge Iain Johnston took his concerns on eDiscovery competence to a whole new level. In DR Distributors, LLC v. 21 Century Smoking, Inc. (2021 WL 185082), Judge Johnston published a 256-page sanctions order that specifically reproved defendants’ counsel for failing to take even the most basic steps to preserve relevant information. In doing so, DR Distributors offers what is tantamount to a 101 course for lawyers on eDiscovery, particularly regarding the need to keep relevant information in litigation and the consequences for counsel who fail to help clients do so.