Philip Favro

One of the most watched lawsuits in recent memory involved a key ethical issue of which lawyers should be aware: the dangers of using self-destructing messaging applications. In Waymo v. Uber, tech titans Google (Waymo) and Uber waged an epic battle over the future of self-driving vehicle technology. Waymo (Google’s autonomous vehicle unit) claimed Uber stole its self-driving vehicle technology in order to develop

Discovery sanctions are often viewed as a litigation game-changer. They seemingly offer a way to tip the scales of justice against a sanctioned party and drive a matter toward settlement. Nevertheless, sanctions have their limitations, particularly if they are not case dispositive.

The blockbuster trade secret action over the future of autonomous vehicle technology is finally over. Tech titans Waymo (Google) and Uber, which had battled for almost a year over Waymo’s allegations that Uber stole scores of its self-driving vehicle trade secrets, settled their dispute today.

The eDiscovery challenges with mobile devices seem to be all over the headlines in 2018. This year alone has seen White House officials and the Missouri governor struggle to address fallout from their respective use of self-destructing messaging applications. One of the most watched trials in the country – Waymo v. Uber – could very well