Tara Emory, PMP
May 14, 2020
Every industry is experiencing an unprecedented time in the wake of social distancing requirements. Previously, many document review supervising attorneys favored review teams working from a secure room, where reviewers were supervised in person. Because this is not possible today, remote review must be considered. But, many attorneys are rightly cautious: how secure can a remote review really be? With the help of strong security processes, biometrics technologies, and environment and device monitoring, attorneys are finding that even with virtual review, their clients’ information remains very secure.
August 16, 2018
There are important differences between searching for documents using technology-assisted review (TAR) and keywords. According to a U.S. Magistrate Judge based in Chicago, math should not be one of them.
April 26, 2018
Every evolution of ediscovery has launched a new set of exciting technologies, efficient workflows and savvy experts. We have come a long way from the old “check the box” view of discovery in which the main measure of a project’s success was whether it avoided adverse consequences like sanctions. Skilled professionals today know how to plan a project strategically, cull enormous amounts of data into manageable sets, leverage machine learning and other computer analytics and use statistics to prove that the needed documents were indeed found.
July 14, 2016
The ideal of cooperation by opposing parties to address eDiscovery has been around for a while now. Since the The Sedona Conference Cooperation Proclamation called for “cooperative, collaborative, [and] transparent discovery” in 2008, adversarial cooperation has been touted among the judiciary and certain practitioners as the key to success in proportional discovery.